|
[Sponsors] |
January 30, 2006, 23:02 |
convergence
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have a problem while running an unsteady case using coupled implicit scheme. The continuity and x,y,z velocity residuals are fluctuating between a constant minimum and maximum. They are going horizontally and parallely without converging. Does it mean that the grid should be refined further or is there something else to be done? Please suggest. Thanks in advance |
|
January 30, 2006, 23:57 |
Re: convergence
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you can try with smaller time steps
|
|
January 31, 2006, 01:46 |
Re: convergence
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Thanks for ur reply. But I tried with smaller time steps as well. Eventually after coming to the time step I required i.e. smaller time step multiplied with number of time steps, the fluctuations are starting again. Hope u have understood what I mean. Kindly suggest an alternative. Thanks |
|
January 31, 2006, 06:29 |
Re: convergence
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What type of fluctuation you have noticed. Typically there is convergence in 20-30 iterations for every time step i.e. residuals drop alteast an order of magnitude and if you have placed a surface monitor it becomes constant in these no. of iterations. Alongwith refining the grid you can test some more things; using different options of solution controls. Also use surface monitors to check whether convergence is acheived for each time step
|
|
January 31, 2006, 08:35 |
Re: convergence
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Are you sure the minimums and maximums are actually constant? I think the coupled implicit solver can make the residuals look like they're oscillating when they are in fact decreasing over a longer number of iterations (much depending on your Courant number).
/Henrik |
|
January 31, 2006, 11:38 |
Re: convergence
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
The fluctuations are remaining without any deterioration. Even after large number of iterations they are present. I tried again by refininig the grid but it did not work out. Can u suggest anything? Thanks |
|
February 1, 2006, 04:04 |
Re: convergence
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please refine your boundary layer if you have....not the entire domain. If it doesn't work detail a bit your geometry and phenomena you want to model...
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence | Centurion2011 | FLUENT | 48 | June 15, 2022 00:29 |
Force can not converge | colopolo | CFX | 13 | October 4, 2011 23:03 |
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis | nasdak | CFX | 2 | June 29, 2009 02:17 |
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence | tippo | CFX | 2 | May 5, 2009 11:55 |
Defect correction and convergence | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 30, 2006 15:20 |