|
[Sponsors] |
January 23, 2006, 17:47 |
Surface Integrals
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Running a 3d simulation of flow through a blockage, I was trying to calculate, in surface integrals, the mass flow rates through planes at different locations downstream. Expecting to get constant values in the planes I was evaluating, the values seem to vary a fair bit. The flow is fairly complicated but the residuals are quite low, most are below 1e-6 although continuity is nearing 1e-5. In this compressible simulation, the planes that were most obviously incorrect had flow in both directions, recirculation zones. Is this because of the way Fluent evaluates a dot product of the area vector and the velocity vector? Any ideas? Thanks a lot.
|
|
January 24, 2006, 19:08 |
Re: Surface Integrals
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How have u defined the bc? with compressible flows u should you a mass flow inlet and not a velocity inlet.
|
|
January 25, 2006, 13:56 |
Re: Surface Integrals
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, thanks for your response.
I have defined the inlet and outlet as pressure BC's. In gambit I defined a couple of interior surfaces that give the right mass flow rate but when I create my own planes in Fluent it gives values that are considerable larger. I'm not sure why that is. Thanks again, -philip |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces | tommymoose | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | December 1, 2020 12:12 |
[Gmsh] Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible | velan | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | October 22, 2015 12:05 |
[Gmsh] Problem with Gmsh | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 23 | August 5, 2015 03:09 |
Mismatch between Fluent Surface Integrals Report and Surface Line/Rake Tool | emlejeen | FLUENT | 0 | March 31, 2010 12:21 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |