|
[Sponsors] |
pressure difference - which surface integral? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 4, 2006, 11:29 |
pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I want to calculate the pressure drop of an apparatus. Now, how to calculate the pressure difference? I take ->report->surface integrals and select the inlet and the outlet of my apparatus. But what report type is the right one? "Integral" or "Area-weighted-Average" or any other?? There are different values resulting... Thanks Ralf |
|
January 4, 2006, 11:46 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think "Area-weighted-Average" is right. In addition, pay attention to the "static pressure difference" and "total pressure difference".
|
|
January 5, 2006, 02:50 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, You have to work with Facet Average (choose total pressure). It will compute the average total pressure on the desired surface. If you take inlet and outlet at the same time, fluent will compute the average on surfaces inlet + outlet. So you have to compute the total pressure (Facet Average) on inlet, and then on the outlet. You get 2 values, one for inlet and one for outlet. dp= paverage inlet - paverage outlet mAx
|
|
January 5, 2006, 04:15 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I'm a little bit confused... When I take total pressure for pressure drop calculation, it is the static + the dynamic pressure... but the velocities in the inlet and in the outlet are different (different cross-sections)! So the dynamic pressure difference will NOT give me right results... isn't it? Second, when Fluent reports the pressures at different times, the values are the same than reporting at the same time. The only difference is that when reporting at the same time, a third value appears: "net". Does anybody know what kind of value that is? It is NOT the difference between inlet and outlet! It is about factor 1,626 smaller than the inlet pressure value (Area-Weighted Average Static Pressure) calculated for 9 different geometries… Any Help is appreciated!! Ralf |
|
January 5, 2006, 05:16 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I suppose the "Net" value is the summ of both values. But as you computed your pressure with Area Weighted Average, the "Net" value you get should be like: paverage = (p1*A1 + p2*A2) /(A1 + A2) where p1,A1 is the pressure and Area on inlet and p2,A2 on outlet. Once again compute your pressure on inlet, and then re-compute the pressure on outlet. Then substract both values. This is my way for computing drop pressures in hydraulic valves.
|
|
January 5, 2006, 06:05 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have doubt about using facet averages for pressure on a surface. I think area weighted is more appropriate since it will work with non-uniform meshes.
|
|
January 9, 2006, 13:18 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I agree with Muhammad and lcw - area weighted average is the option to choose, facet average will give you results based on the size of the mesh facets. This was a mistake that I initially made when I started with Fluent.
|
|
January 10, 2006, 01:27 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ok, but in my cases, it doesn't change my results ( I checked and compared with facet average / area weighted average / Mass weigthed average) I get always the same results.
|
|
January 17, 2006, 16:41 |
Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you a lot. It works!
|
|
December 11, 2012, 14:25 |
Total or static
|
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 15 |
The pressure you measured at the inlet is total pressure or static pressure? Can someone clarify this ? I'm guessing it's total pressure as the surface is perpendicular to the flow direction. But on the other hand, the surface is not like the Pitot tube but only doing the average. I got confused. Please advice.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Referencing a Surface Monitor or Surface Integral in a UDF | lanterbw | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | January 28, 2013 16:31 |
Pulsatile pressure inlet with pressure outlet | a.lynchy | FLUENT | 3 | March 23, 2012 14:45 |
Pneumatic simulation - moving wall as a function of a pressure difference | jbmackay | OpenFOAM | 0 | September 22, 2010 16:51 |
[Gmsh] boundaries with gmshToFoam | ouafa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | May 21, 2010 13:43 |
Does star cd takes reference pressure? | monica | Siemens | 1 | April 19, 2007 12:26 |