|
[Sponsors] |
December 22, 2005, 20:05 |
Time step size
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've modeled vortex shedding using a time step that is 1/30 of the period of shedding(Fluent manual suggests at least 1/20) with good results. For the Re #'s and Str #'s I've been looking at this corresponds to a step of approx. 0.03 s. Yet, I've read several postings where someone is modeling a similar phenomenon, shedding from a cir. cylinder for example, and they're using a delta t aound 0.00001. Why so small?
|
|
December 24, 2005, 00:00 |
Re: Time step size
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The period of shedding and time step required for flow around cylinder in narrow channels is much less. May be these postings are for these cases.
|
|
December 26, 2005, 00:39 |
Re: Time step size
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sounds reasonable. I've actually modeled a thin plate in a channel for different blockage ratios and found that the Str# does increase significantly, but I didn't have to decrease my time step size quite so small to capture 1/30th of the period. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
critical error during installation of openfoam | Fabio88 | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | June 2, 2010 04:01 |
Modeling in micron scale using icoFoam | m9819348 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | October 27, 2007 01:36 |
natural convection - time step size | co2 | FLUENT | 7 | June 3, 2004 22:56 |
how to increase time step size? | co2 | FLUENT | 6 | May 17, 2004 08:25 |