|
[Sponsors] |
November 29, 2005, 05:39 |
Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
to start a simulation one should initialize the solution first. For turbulence models in FLUENT like RS model, it is necessary to have a good initial guess(initial solution). how to get a god initial guess. Is there any standard method. Thanks in advance |
|
November 29, 2005, 08:20 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Madhukar, You can use the "Initialize" feature in the "Solve" Menu to intialize the solution. This then allows use to use the "Iterate" panel. If you would like to initiate a solution that may have convergence issues, I believe it can be useful to set the viscosity model to "inviscid," then initialize it, then iterate it for a while (or until convergence), then reset the viscosity model to your desired setting, and continue with more iterations (without re-initializing). The inviscid solution will therefore be a useful starting point for a more complex viscous modeling effort. - John
|
|
November 29, 2005, 09:19 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
You can also run your case with K-epsilon model for some iterations for good intial guess,and then u can change the viscous model to RSM. regards/ Pavitran D |
|
November 29, 2005, 11:12 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Starting with ke wont help you with RSM because ke does not provide an inital solution for the reynolds stress terms. Although the manual states it is good to start a RSM calculation with ke i have some doubts about this. I talked with a fluent engineer and his opinion was to go all the way RSM if you have to use it and forget about the ke start. I dont use RSM so i cant comment on it very deeply but it would be good if someone with some more experience could give some advice if its good (or not) to start RSM with ke.
RoM |
|
November 29, 2005, 15:56 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For external aerodynamics fluent advises not to use other rans models to initialize the flow (I believe RoM already stated this in the previous email.
Start with the rsm model directly. Use first order schemes for some time and then shift to second order ones. There is a short manual on external aerodynamics provided by fluent on their user service website. You can look at that to see the steps to be followed to use rsm. Anindya |
|
November 30, 2005, 03:43 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi rom,
I am not sure about this, but think over it and if i am wrong please reply me back In Fluent the production terms in normal stress tranport equations of RSM are modelled with boussinesq assumption. So, dont u think we have a good approximation of turbulent viscosity (since turbulent viscosity = cmu*k*k/epsilon in RSM) and also the corresponding velocity gradients (ex:du/dy, dv/dy of P11 for uu transport equation and P12 for uv transport equation). regards/ Pavitran D |
|
November 30, 2005, 06:11 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi All!
There are two ways to impose an initial solution for this problem. 1)From initialization panel, where sb imposes constant values for entire flow field. 2)Step by step solution process. At the beginning sb can start from a solution which approximates the final solution and then use the 'approximate solution' as initial guess for the final. Using the RSM,I think it's better to have an 'approximate solution' which is closer to the final (start with inviscid flow, k-e model) than impose constant values for entire flow field (to start directly with RSM) which is farther away from reality even from the previous 'approximate solution'. My experience is that: I simulated an external (low Reynolds,turbulent)flow around a 2D circular cylinder using RSM .To get solution I was compelled to use as initial guess an 'approximate solution' otherwise my problem didn't converge! I used as initial solution the k-e model and the final results were excellent. |
|
December 5, 2005, 01:12 |
Re: Initial solution for Turbulence models
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Madhu,
Actually in InHouse coding Practise it's recommended to approximate Reynolds Stresses to nuti and strain-rate. where nuti is obtained from Mixing Length Hypothis. Once you start getting Approximate solution feild for mean flow, Reynolds stresses are calculated by solving all RS transport equations. In FLuent, I don't know how exactly it works. My Experiance with RSM in Fluent is You first start your simulations with K-Epsilon model where you can specify Turbulent Intensity and Hydrolic diamter. These two parameters are used to get initial guess. But in reality your initial guess should always be close to your final solution for that you must have some priori knowledge on your system you r studying. Murthy |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Darcy-Forchheimer law for specifying Porous Zones | Ger_US | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 37 | April 10, 2022 04:38 |
icoLagrangianFoam OF1.6 myNewParticleSolver | heavy_user | OpenFOAM | 23 | June 2, 2020 03:18 |
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence | jonmec | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 28, 2011 06:24 |
TurbFoam problemlarge Co number | sunnysun | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | March 10, 2009 09:05 |
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases | paean | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 14, 2008 22:14 |