|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2005, 10:15 |
DPM and swirling flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello all.
I wonder if someone can help me? I am having problems with simulating a swirl burner that uses liquid fuel. I can simulate the flow just fine and I am able to get a recirculation zone in front of the burner as expected. The problem starts when I inject fuel droplets in the recirculation zone. My residuals go crazy, and no matter how big interval between the DPM iterations it doesn't normalize. I seem to be getting very large gas phase velocities in the same region. I have tried smaller fuel droplets velocities, smaller under-relaxation factors for Discrete phase, but nothing works. Has anyone had experience with that kind of problem? Thanks in advance, Vix |
|
November 9, 2005, 10:36 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Try a small urf for density, density 0.5 and dpm 0.2 usually works fine. Do you have your own reaction kinectis?
RoM |
|
November 10, 2005, 03:43 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Urf is under-relaxation factor right? OK, I'll try. I am not using reaction kinetics but equilibrium chemistry (PDF look-up tables)
Are you working on a similar problem? ViX |
|
November 10, 2005, 03:53 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you use your own kinetics it could lead to numerical problems due to stiff chemistry but with equlibrium pdf this should not happen. I did some coal combustion recently and it worked well with underrelaxation 0.5 for density and 0.2 for dpm.
Good Luck, RoM |
|
November 10, 2005, 05:28 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I seem to be getting a divergence even if I exclude reactions, just the interaction of discrete phase and continous phase is a problem.
Thanks for your advice! |
|
November 11, 2005, 03:17 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Did you try a smaller particle mass flux? You may want to increase that in steps.
|
|
November 11, 2005, 05:56 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am getting better results with a much lower mass flux, thanks, but still no convergence.
Could this also be a problem of the Lenght scale in the DPM panel? How does this affect residuals. Vix |
|
November 11, 2005, 06:33 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sometimes fluent will calculate very large dpm concentrations, usually in the area of the dpm injections. You can use the adpat->iso value panel to calculate the max dpm concentration in your domain. If its close to your liquid fuel density (or even larger) you will get a problem with convergeance.
RoM |
|
November 11, 2005, 08:37 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And how do I resolve this problem with a very high concentration?
|
|
November 11, 2005, 09:25 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is no general solution to this problem. Your injection should enclose a large number of cells so the total mass flow is spilt. Dont use single injections or small group/cone injections for high mass flow rates. Use surface injections with fine surfaces meshes instead.
RoM |
|
November 13, 2005, 06:46 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your very helpful remarks and advice.
I' ll try to remesh my model and redistribute the DPM source and increase the number of particles in a group. ViX |
|
November 14, 2005, 04:51 |
Re: DPM and swirling flow
|
#12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What also helped for me was to do 1 DPM iteration per continuous phase iteration (otherwise residuals oscilalte), and to create a decent initial velocity field by creating a gas velocity inlet with the spray droplet velocity at the same spot.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wall function for DPM needed | AMusteykis | FLUENT | 0 | January 13, 2010 16:02 |
DPM slow evaporation | Vix | FLUENT | 3 | November 30, 2005 14:38 |
Problem with DPM model | cwflying | FLUENT | 5 | January 31, 2003 12:25 |