|
[Sponsors] |
October 28, 2005, 09:47 |
Convergence with coupled implicit solver
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello!
I have an unsteady simulation that I have run earlier versions of using the segregated solver, and that worked just fine. However, now I want to add a very fast chemical reaction to my system, which will make the problem stiff. This causes the segregated solver to have problems as the reaction starts after a few hundred timesteps. I therefore want to change to the coupled (implicit) solver and also possibly use the special stiff-chemistry ODE solver that is built-in in the coupled solver. My problem is, though, that when I change to the coupled solver, the solution diverges already in the first timestep (that is, before the reaction even takes place and for a situation where the segregated solver still works OK)... So, what can I do to get it to work? I have tried very low Courant numbers, but that does not seem to help (only slow down the rate at which it diverges). Are there any other parameters that I should experiment with? (FAS in the explicit formulation is not applicable since it is an unsteady simulation). Any help or hints is greatly appreciated! Thanks, Henrik |
|
October 29, 2005, 04:57 |
Re: Convergence with coupled implicit solver
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi 1-use very small time step for first itration 2-use very small cournt number in first 3-enable stiff model 4- refine your mesh goodbye
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coupled PDEs solver wanted | navi.vonavi_1874 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 5, 2010 11:48 |
Problem with Coupled Solver! | Parag Gadgil | Main CFD Forum | 2 | December 20, 2007 14:02 |
Transient UDS with coupled solver | Dmitriy Makarov | FLUENT | 1 | February 9, 2007 18:06 |
switching from coupled solver to segregated | Oz | FLUENT | 2 | November 8, 2006 17:02 |
Can I use coupled solver for this problem | Frank | FLUENT | 0 | April 11, 2006 07:28 |