|
[Sponsors] |
October 21, 2005, 07:25 |
No boundary layer
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, I just faced a ceratin problem, that is meshing an extremely complicated geometry of an experimental combustion chamber. As it is the early stage of its development, CFD results are needed to get a rough idea of velocities, pressure drops and so on. My question is whether complete elimination of boundary layer will still give some rough results? I do not know how wall functions will behave and so on and is it altogether possible to obtain the solution? Reason for my question is that the geometry is huge, computer resources highly limited and results do not need to be highly accurate. Thanks for any help.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] Default Faces on Boundary Layer | axel | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | February 17, 2011 08:47 |
Boundary Layer Question | scottneh | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | September 30, 2010 15:21 |
Adapt mesh without modifying boundary layer cells? | Freeman | FLUENT | 0 | February 22, 2009 15:11 |
3D Boundary Layer | Mario | FLUENT | 0 | February 17, 2009 04:40 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |