|
[Sponsors] |
October 20, 2005, 11:18 |
Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
If I want to simualte a case with Ma >5, which software is better, Fluent or CFX? Or another one? Thanks. yflin |
|
October 21, 2005, 06:56 |
Re: Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
They all can't do it! You can use Fastran(CFDRC). The Fastran is designed to calculate the high Mach Fluid.
|
|
October 23, 2005, 05:53 |
Re: Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Although I do not know the situation after ESI thing, Fastran was good in aerothermal flows, I am not sure about CFX but I know Fluent can solve hypersonic flows. Fluent has a validation case where Ma=29.45(Yes, Ma=29.45!) around a sphere is simulated. The results are compared with two experimental data, one of Widhopf AIAA-88-2711, the other Dellinger AIAA-69-655 and there is an excellent agreement. Please note that flow is dissociating --> in chemical non-equilibrium. Regards, Emre |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 03:54 |
Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 14:14 |
OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX | marco | Main CFD Forum | 81 | March 31, 2009 15:22 |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 05:13 |
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 16:02 |