|
[Sponsors] |
September 14, 2005, 12:41 |
Modeling engine effects
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
My question is about modeling the effect of a gas turbine on the flow through an intake duct.
I have an intake duct, turbine and exhaust duct in a standard configuration: Intake Duct volume --> Boundary Condition Face --> Turbine Volume (empty, not meshed) --> Boundary Condition Face --> Exhaust Duct volume What B.C should I use at the end of the Intake duct volume - I know the massflow that the turbine requires, but not the Static Pressure or Total Pressure at this face. What B.C for the inlet face of the Exhaust Duct? -Thanks Riaan |
|
September 15, 2005, 04:20 |
Re: Modeling engine effects
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Do you want to MODEL the turbine, not actually calculate it (I mean you do not want to insert real turbine geometry in the middle volume and take its effects into account by simply imposing BC on the two faces)?
Razvan |
|
September 15, 2005, 08:44 |
Re: Modeling engine effects
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No, I don't want to model the turbine, just have a "black box" with inlet and exit b.c. similar to what a turbine would generate.
|
|
September 15, 2005, 15:00 |
Re: Modeling engine effects
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Let me explain myself:
- MODELING = taking into account the possible effects of a certain geometry by analitical means, approximating it with a mathematical model, actually deliberately imposing not calculating its properties; - SIMULATING = considering real geometry, calculating effects by imposing conditions on boundaries away from actual object. So, what you're trying to do is MODEL the turbine, not SIMULATE it! Concerning your problem, the only way I can imagine solving it is this: - eliminate first and second volume and keep only exhaust pipe with turbine exit as inlet condition - calculate by hand or using a mathematical program the radial distribution of fluid's thermodynamic properties based on specific turbomachinery relations - input these radial profiles as BC at the inlet boundary - obtain solution. Of course, you will have to repeat steps 2-4 for every mass flow you need to consider. Best wishes, Razvan |
|
September 19, 2005, 09:24 |
Re: Modeling engine effects
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Found easier way. Set Mass-flow inlet B.C. at the turbine inlet face, with the mass-flow vector pointing "into" the turbine. Since this is a subsonic case, pressure values on the b.c. face will be interpolated from the cells next to the b.c.
Anycase, agree on difference between modeling and simulating. Quick and dirty forum post - sorry. |
|
September 20, 2005, 18:45 |
Re: Modeling engine effects
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Running into problems - seems the Mass-flow inlet creates a local strong shock in the exit plane...M>2...don't know why yet?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modeling Hyrogen Sealing in an internal combustion Engine | anatoliafire | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 3, 2010 03:40 |
Intrenal combustion engine (CI) modeling | Majid | FLUENT | 0 | August 2, 2009 10:04 |
Problems modeling subsonic engine air inlet with flow separation | TWaung | CFX | 2 | March 29, 2009 19:42 |
I.C. Engine Modeling | Abdel-Fattah M. Mahrous | Siemens | 1 | April 23, 2005 02:13 |
1-D Engine Network Modeling | Zamir | Main CFD Forum | 10 | November 24, 2004 04:18 |