|
[Sponsors] |
The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 21, 2005, 06:55 |
The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi CFDers,
My question concerns meshing a geometry with two different sized meshes. My 3D problem is a U shaped pipe (0.5m diameter) with several small injection nozzles (10mm diameter). In GAMBIT I have tried to save on mesh cell count by creating a fine mesh inside the small nozzles and retaining a coarse mesh through the main pipe. Separating the regions using a connected split operation. The small mesh size is 10mm while the large mesh is 100mm, total cell count 90k. In Fluent the problem will converge poorly for a basic flow problem (vel-Inlet, pressure-Oulet, single phase). I would like to improve convergence of the problem to <10-2 residuals. Any ideas? Best regards, Owen |
|
June 21, 2005, 10:49 |
Re: The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Owen:
I suggest to Use non-conformal meshing. first create the U shape pipe and nozzels separately in mesh files. then merge them using tmerge utility. then assign interface 1 to the nozzel interfaces in interface creation in FLUENT.this would improve your convergence. Also i suggest to use two step for fining your mesh. The ratio of ten seems to be large. Use 3-5 as maximum. Regards Mehdi Ghoddosy |
|
June 22, 2005, 06:16 |
Re: The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your help Mehdi. Until you suggested it I had never heard of the T-merge function.
Is there any advantage to creating separate mesh files and merging them in Fluent (with T-merge) over simply creating the two volumes in GAMBIT and meshing them with different size meshes? I ask this because I find GAMBIT easier to use since it offers more flexibility to manipulate the mesh interface and check skewness. I have taken your advice to increase the mesh size in two steps - this appeared to reduce the number of highly skewed elements at the interface. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] Problem with mesh in Gambit | giuseppemerlini | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 12 | November 10, 2014 02:04 |
[Commercial meshers] Problem with Mesh conversion Gambit msh Foam | Rachid BANNARI (Bannari) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 25 | September 11, 2011 08:58 |
[Gmsh] gmshToFoam problem: not the same mesh in Gmsh vs. paraview | zhernadi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | July 7, 2011 03:28 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
Problem for making mesh in GAMBIT | chlim | FLUENT | 0 | July 8, 2005 19:23 |