Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Is there something more suitable than GAMBIT?

Updated Threads

Reply

Search this Thread

May 17, 2005, 05:59	Is there something more suitable than GAMBIT?	#1
Owen Guest Posts: n/a	Hi Users, I have been given a project to model fluid flow through a porous rock core. The core sample contains a complex geometry of organic curves and is in ASCII format. What kind of pre-processor could you recommend for constructing this geometry? Thanks in advance, Owen

May 18, 2005, 06:02	Re: Is there something more suitable than GAMBIT?	#2
Harish Guest Posts: n/a	Autocad might be a good option H

Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out	saii	CFX	12	March 19, 2018 06:21
Constant velocity of the material	Sas	CFX	15	July 13, 2010 09:56
Gambit 2.3.16, Xming or Exceed...HELP!	bambam3417	FLUENT	10	May 7, 2010 13:39
Gambit -dev X11 doesn't work	Ervin Amet	FLUENT	0	October 28, 2007 09:33
Gambit boundary conditions not suitable for fluent	ann	FLUENT	3	October 12, 2005 13:51

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:08.