|
[Sponsors] |
May 16, 2005, 21:14 |
2nd order divergence
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am modelling a cavity (L/D=5) with flow speed M=0.85. It's a 2-d very fine quadrilateral mesh so I do not think I should need to refine further to solve my problem. I am able to get a converged 1st order unsteady solution but when I switch to 2nd order discretization, my solution blows up (specifically, continuity residual). I am using a segregated solver. I have tried decreasing under-relaxation factors (down to 0.3!) and time steps significantly (down to 1e-8!) and iterating, and still no luck.
FYI, I am using Fluent 6.2.16. Turbulence model is k-omega SST with transitional flow, compressibility effects and viscous heating options all turned on. Any suggestions out there?? Thanks in advance, Regina |
|
May 17, 2005, 04:08 |
Re: 2nd order divergence
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes!use the coupled solver.Luca
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
IS calc. with 2nd order discret. always necessary? | Azman | FLUENT | 2 | March 14, 2013 05:28 |
1st order vs 2nd order | ken | FLUENT | 8 | March 14, 2013 04:43 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
Unstable flow simpleFoam 2nd order | Valle | OpenFOAM | 0 | August 26, 2009 09:12 |