|
[Sponsors] |
April 12, 2005, 14:43 |
Un-even Periodic Interface Problem
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have created a model that is very similar to the 2-D sliding mesh tutorial that is in help files. The problem I have is that the stator periodicity is 1.92in to the rotor's periodicity of 1.15in so that the two don't line up. When I create the interface and run the stationary mesh to get an initial guess going (like in the tutorial) the excess face of the stator dumps the flowing air into null space and the velocities go up ten fold at this edge, basically a meaningless model. I realize that the un-even periodicity means that the periodically created stationary rotors will not have the same result as each other but I can't even get the unsteady sliding mesh model to run properly for the reasons above. According to the tutorial you should be able to create an interface with two surfaces of differing size but this does not appear to be the case from what I am seeing here.
Thank you for any help you can offer. Jonathan |
|
April 12, 2005, 17:44 |
Re: Un-even Periodic Interface Problem
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Are the boundaries normal to the direction of travel linked and defined as periodic in Gambit?
|
|
April 12, 2005, 17:47 |
Re: Un-even Periodic Interface Problem
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with interface | Roland R | CFX | 6 | March 1, 2018 09:24 |
Contour Problem in Interface Boundary | inra | FLUENT | 1 | May 29, 2010 06:22 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
wrong seting the problem? rotor/stator interface | yochule | FLUENT | 0 | March 18, 2009 10:19 |
2D periodic problem | Markus | CFX | 0 | August 4, 2008 15:43 |