|
[Sponsors] |
April 8, 2005, 18:35 |
Under-relaxation factors
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I know that a converged solution is independent of the value of URF's chosen. However, is it acceptable to change URF's in the middle of a solution and then continue iterating?
|
|
April 9, 2005, 08:49 |
Re: Under-relaxation factors
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes it is acceptable.
You're right when you say that a converged solution does not depend on the value of URF's, but the convergence of a solution is dependent on their values, and also by the combination of them. Some authors like Peric, for example, suggests some rule of thumb like a_velocity + a_pressure = 1 where a represents the URF. Regards, ap |
|
April 9, 2005, 11:22 |
Re: Under-relaxation factors
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
regarding URF's,can excessive under-relaxation introduce accuracies in unsteady flows. that is, although solution will be converged but not accurate?
Swarup. |
|
April 9, 2005, 14:55 |
Re: Under-relaxation factors
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Swarup, You meant "introduce inaccuracies" right?
|
|
April 9, 2005, 14:56 |
Re: Under-relaxation factors
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the information ap. Very well worded indeed!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Relaxation Factors for Transient solvers | philippose | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 19 | March 20, 2014 05:39 |
Purpose of relaxation factors | Mohsin | FLUENT | 5 | April 30, 2010 12:57 |
relaxation factors and time accuracy | Mike | Main CFD Forum | 7 | May 21, 2005 13:41 |
Relaxation Factors | Tim | Phoenics | 3 | June 30, 2004 03:03 |
relaxation factors adjust | zhujianguo | Phoenics | 1 | July 15, 2003 12:11 |