|
[Sponsors] |
March 21, 2005, 07:59 |
A good question about UDS
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I want to know if you implement something in Fluent like a new eqution using UDS. 1)How are you checking whether you implemented something is correct or not obviously to check the results for the simple cases. But I do not want to do this. is there any other method for it. 2)Lets say if I implement same equation using UDS. Let us say use k-epsilon turbulnce model now you want to implement a new model of your own. What I would do first is to implement k-epsilon model using UDS and run some simulations by switching off the k-epsilon equation in Fluent but switching on the UDS equations and it will be a good test to check whether UDS gives you good results or not.
Any suggestions or did somebody did something like this |
|
March 31, 2005, 16:14 |
Re: A good question about UDS
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
1) You check the code and try to use it on simple known cases. No other solutions.
2) If you want to implement an alternative k-eps model, you have two choices: a) Add the lacking terms to the existing model in FLUENT as source terms, if possible. b) Re-write the model completely using UDS. In this case, you have to set the case up, as if you'd use the k-eps model of FLUENT, then disable the turbulence equations of FLUENT in the Control-> Solution panel. Pay attention to a thing: you have to implement both the k and epsilon equation, but you also have to redefine the turbulent viscosity using the proper DEFINE macro and hooking this to FLUENT in the Model->Viscous panel. Best regards, ap |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about UDS diffusivity | zhaohui | FLUENT | 1 | March 7, 2018 02:39 |
A question about UDS (user difined scalar) | chaozhong.qin | FLUENT | 2 | September 22, 2010 06:21 |
UDS question | Z | FLUENT | 5 | April 2, 2005 15:45 |
UDS question | Z | FLUENT | 1 | March 31, 2005 16:08 |
UDS Question | Z | FLUENT | 0 | March 25, 2005 07:20 |