|
[Sponsors] |
The difference between Laminar model and DNS at lo |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 11, 2005, 21:22 |
The difference between Laminar model and DNS at lo
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,all, I am newer in CFD. Laminar model is preferable when I choose a mathematical model for low Re problem in Fluent(for example, channel flow less than 2000). But I cannot make a differnce betwwen laminar model and DNS at low Re because here laminar model solves the N-S equation directly. Can I say that Laminar model equals to DNS at low Re given that the mesh resolution is suffcient small? Many thanks!
|
|
March 13, 2005, 18:57 |
Re: The difference between Laminar model and DNS a
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can say that.
|
|
March 13, 2005, 23:55 |
Re: The difference between Laminar model and DNS a
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks. However, if Re is greater than 2000, how about the difference given the mesh resolution is sufficent small? If it is okay, can we say that laminar model equals to DNS?
|
|
March 14, 2005, 07:33 |
Re: The difference between Laminar model and DNS a
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi!
Be carefull with the phrase suficient resolution when talking about DNS...That means about 10^10 nodes for Re=2000 (Re^3)... Otherwise you can say that... MATEUS |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laminar model in Fluent | thecfduser | FLUENT | 8 | February 8, 2016 14:42 |
New implemented algebraic Reynolds stress model | volker | OpenFOAM | 13 | October 21, 2013 01:01 |
DNS with fluent | jenny | FLUENT | 14 | December 2, 2009 09:52 |
Laminar solver? LES? or DNS? | Ray | Main CFD Forum | 5 | March 19, 2003 11:19 |
Laminar model the same as DNS? | Kerrin | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 24, 2003 16:12 |