|
[Sponsors] |
March 11, 2005, 07:08 |
flow behind a geometry
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am simulating flow behing a bluff body.I have read in some paper the this phenomena is unsteady as one can observe constant vortex shedding behind this body. But when i simulate this in Fluent using usteady code I do not get any unsteadiness. How can I capture the unsteadiness using Fluent code. pp
|
|
March 11, 2005, 12:41 |
Re: flow behind a geometry
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
if you are using a RANS turbulence model (k-epsilon or something like that) it's of little or no use computing it unsteady. Because RANS is a model that is meant to give a time averaged result. You'll only be able to observe any fluctuations if your inverse turbulent timescale (k/epsilon)^-1 is bigger than your vortex shedding frequency behind your bluff body.... you should perform LES, but it means that you'll have a hihger computational cost!!!
|
|
March 11, 2005, 13:41 |
Re: flow behind a geometry
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What is they hysical reasons behind such an statement. "any fluctuations if your inverse turbulent timescale (k/epsilon)^-1 is bigger than your vortex shedding frequency behind your bluff body" Actually I have some papers where they perform this unsteady calculation and obatin the correct vortex shedding frequency. pp
|
|
March 12, 2005, 23:05 |
Re: flow behind a geometry
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That is your turbulence time scale should be smaller than vortex shedding time scale. At least an order lower. And you mesh is dense enough!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 8 | August 11, 2015 14:00 |
Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX | fatb0y | CFX | 3 | January 14, 2012 20:42 |
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry | EmersonKB | CFX | 5 | July 2, 2009 09:17 |
Is an uniform flow possible for this geometry? | Michael Hu | FLUENT | 1 | April 13, 2006 23:11 |