CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Modelling combustion (3D VS 2D)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 8, 2005, 04:40
Default Modelling combustion (3D VS 2D)
  #1
christophe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I've already sent a mail about a trouble to model a propergol combustion in a chamber.

I mean I modeled this case with a pressure inlet BC. First, I had a mesh which gave me a straight temperature evolution along the revolution axis of the pressure inlet BC section.

Then, I tried to model in a 2D case with a 2d axisymetric case. I reached the same results (no really decreasing of temperature gases along the axis (the pressure inlet BC section is 0.050 m diameter, and I do not have temperature decreasing 20 m away from the inlet BC !.

But I was not satisfied of this results, that is why I modeled a new 3D case with a better size function, and here I got a decrease at 2,50 m from the inlet.

I do believe the last modelling results are better, but someone could give me his feeling about this...(realistic phenomenum, not able to reproduce a 2D case...)

Many thanks

Christophe
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Combustion modelling in OpenFOAM - Difficulties AleDR OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 23 January 31, 2021 00:40
Modelling Combustion in Porous Zone tanjinjack FLUENT 2 September 26, 2016 05:10
Combustion modelling results accuracies Les Main CFD Forum 7 June 1, 2011 09:55
Combustion modelling with energy source Marc_L FLUENT 0 July 13, 2010 08:58
Combustion Modelling Ridwan FLUENT 1 June 27, 2005 10:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:08.