|
[Sponsors] |
January 25, 2005, 04:59 |
Difference between 2D and 3D !
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody !
I would be very pleased if someone could give me information about a "possible mistake" I made in a modelisation. I made a 3D case modeling a combustion in a closed volume. Source is a exit nozzle and boundary condition is "pressure inlet" (I know P, T0 and Pstat). I get the convergence and analyse pressure and temperature fieds on the wall in front of the exit source (3,00 m away). I try to realize an equivalent in 2D with an axisymmetric case. The boundary condition "axis" is along the x-axis. I kept the source data defined for 3d case. I mesh the plane with size-function along x that is to say along the flow. The trouble is that I do not get the same result in pressure and temperature (20% different) and the time the flow impact the wall target is greater in the 2d case (6 ms) than for the 3d (3.5 ms). What could be the matter ? Time-step ? Use of a size function ? I hope this trouble could find a answer... Thanks... |
|
January 25, 2005, 13:21 |
Re: Difference between 2D and 3D !
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
First of all, try to reproduce the mesh you used in 3D in the Axi case.
However, I had similar problems in many cases. Usually a flow is not fully symmetrical, so using the axi solver might not be appropriate. Hi, ap |
|
January 26, 2005, 04:10 |
Re: Difference between 2D and 3D !
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Thanks for your answer. In fact I am not sure that the size function used in the 2d case is the same than in the 3D. I will check it now. Christophe |
|
|
|