|
[Sponsors] |
January 14, 2005, 15:40 |
Guage vs. Absolute pressures in Fluent.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi guys,
I am running 2 identical cases, except that one uses guage pressures on the B.C (operation condition = 101352Pa) and the other uses absolute pressures (operating condition = 0Pa) on the B.C. When I use guage pressures, the case converges to 10e-4, but when I use the absolute pressures to 10e-2 and levels off. In my case, I am using a 1st order segregated solver, laminar, PISO, with pressure far-field and pressure inlet and exit B.C. My freestream Ma number is above 0.1, so the Fluent manual states that I should rather use absolute pressures. Has anyone come across something similar? Thanks, Riaan |
|
January 21, 2005, 15:22 |
Re: Guage vs. Absolute pressures in Fluent.
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quick Update: I have managed to do a couple more cases - and it still appears that if I use guage pressures I get much better convergence than absolute pressures.....
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 04:22 |
Abaqus - Fluent Coupling WITHOUT MPCCI | s.mishra | FLUENT | 1 | April 5, 2016 07:47 |
What the differences flow equation of Fluent 6.3 and Fluent 12.1 | opehterinar81 | FLUENT | 0 | August 19, 2011 12:55 |
absolute pressure unit in Fluent? | shuqin | FLUENT | 0 | May 23, 2006 09:44 |
How does FLUENT fair in absolute heat transfer analysis | Steve Aboagye | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 31, 1998 13:12 |