CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

magnus effect

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 19, 2004, 03:10
Default magnus effect
  #1
jackie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I'm a newer in Fluent program. I'm going to simulate a flow across a very long rotating cylinder (Magnus effect). I like to siumulate it as a 2D flow so, I would like to know can I use a rotating frame in 2D simulation? or it's more easier to use the other method. Could anybody give some sugestion please?

Thank you in advance?

Jackie
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2004, 19:57
Default Re: magnus effect
  #2
Mani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am not a Fluent user, but I read this as a fairly general question. There is no need to use a rotating reference frame in your case, in fact, it will only complicate things. If you know how to set up a computation with a stationary (non-rotating) cylinder, then the rotating cylinder should be easy to do. You only need to assign the correct boundary conditions, i.e. the velocities of the wall grid points, on the cylinder surface. Everything else is the same as in the stationary case, and the grid is also stationary.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to create rotary domain for Magnus effect vovogoal CFX 0 March 22, 2009 16:22
VOF and strong surface tension effect phsieh2005 Main CFD Forum 1 August 30, 2005 07:56
magnus effect benoit FLUENT 1 June 4, 2002 05:00
Iclude particle diameter effect in wall? yueroo FLUENT 0 April 14, 2001 04:56
Magnus Effect Model Dahvid Brown FLUENT 1 February 24, 2000 11:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:36.