|
[Sponsors] |
October 23, 2004, 11:31 |
Grid height - Rougness v/s Laminar Sub Layer
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am doing a roughness case study, hence I can only employ near-wall boundary condition implying my y+ <= 1. Hence my 1st grid cell height near the wall is 4micro m. I hence also obtain about 15 points in the laminar sub layer.
But maximum roughness height Ks is 2mm. According to Fluent User Guide, the distance from the wall to the centroid of the wall-adjacent cell should be greater than Ks, implying my first cell height should be 4mm! If i increase y+ and make my first cell height 4mm, I neither get 10points within the laminar sublayer nor can i use near-wall modeling. I get about 2 points within the turbulent boundary layer! What should I base my cell height on? Thanks in advance, Johnson.Mendonca |
|
October 28, 2004, 15:18 |
Re: Grid height - Rougness v/s Laminar Sub Layer
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I may base it on Re-turbulent number. All the best |
|
October 29, 2004, 00:53 |
Re: Grid height - Rougness v/s Laminar Sub Layer
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If first cell height is less than roughness height Ks, how to mesh it ?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Boundary layer in a pipe | Clementhuon | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | March 12, 2012 13:41 |
[snappyHexMesh] Boundary layer generation problems | ivan_cozza | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | October 6, 2010 14:47 |
Error near boundary layer as 1st grid decrease | CF | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 3, 2007 11:21 |
Using grid spacing calculator for laminar flow | CH | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 5, 2006 01:02 |
Grid Independent Solution | Chuck Leakeas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 26, 2000 12:18 |