|
[Sponsors] |
October 13, 2004, 18:26 |
questions about keps model and wall function
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all, If I use the k-eps model in the "viscous/models/..." and select enhance wall treatment in the 'near wall treatement'. Does this combination mean low Re number model? If right, which low-re-model it correspond? Thanks a lot!
sarah |
|
October 14, 2004, 06:31 |
Re: questions about keps model and wall function
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If your y+<=1 it is low Re solved with a k-l or one-equation model. if your y+>1 the solution is a blending between a low Re and adapted Wall Functions. Try the manuals, its rather complicated to explain in a few words...
|
|
October 14, 2004, 11:47 |
Re: questions about keps model and wall function
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear dieter,
Thanks for your reply. Then if my y+<=1, and just repeat the procedure as follows: k-eps model: "viscous/models/..." enhanced wall treatment:'near wall treatement'. So it means the combination should be a low -Reynolds number model? If so, it corresponds which low-reynolds number model? 0 Abid 1 Lam-Bremhorst 2 Launder-Sharma 3 Yang-Shih 4 Abe-Kondoh-Nagano 5 Chang-Hsieh-Chen Thanks a lot! sarah |
|
October 15, 2004, 08:50 |
Re: questions about keps model and wall function
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
that I don't know very well. I think Fluent takes his Low-Reynoldsmodifications (damping functions) from several sources... but it is not clearly explained in the manuals.So I can't answer that question properly, sorry for that
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 4 | December 2, 2019 01:04 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |
Standard wall function vs Two layer model | C. ORTEGA | FLUENT | 0 | July 7, 2003 09:35 |