|
[Sponsors] |
October 8, 2004, 13:41 |
Wall Function Approach..!!
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Did any body have knowledge of using standard wall function and enhanced wall treatment in k-e model. I am having some problem in which one to select. I also have to include wall roughness which I think I can't include in Enhanced wall treament. On what basis the selection has to be made. Thanx in advance Titiksh |
|
October 8, 2004, 13:53 |
Re: Wall Function Approach..!!
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
it is general practice to use the standard wall funciton (spalding) and it has achieved the excellent success in industry
AS the qualitative results are concerd both have little differnce any other comments !!!!! |
|
October 8, 2004, 23:06 |
Re: Wall Function Approach..!!
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In my opinion, If focusing on main characteristic of flow domain , standard wall funciton is enough. If wall domain is important to your problem, specially qualitative budget, for example, energy balance, using enhanced wall condition is necessary.
|
|
October 9, 2004, 05:30 |
Re: Wall Function Approach..!!
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Wat should be value of y plus for standard wall functions (splading)
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning | gaottino | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | July 19, 2010 15:11 |
Problem with compile the setParabolicInlet | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | September 5, 2008 21:50 |
OpenFoam 14 installation problem | gfcoppola | OpenFOAM Installation | 20 | November 2, 2007 14:38 |
Droplet Evaporation | Christian | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 27, 2007 07:27 |