|
[Sponsors] |
Choice of turbulent models for jet impingement |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 27, 2004, 18:56 |
Choice of turbulent models for jet impingement
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I am currently working on submerged jet impingement cooling using the K-Epsilon "realizable" and K-Omega models. Could you give me the values of the wall Y+ that I should use with both these models? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Akash |
|
September 28, 2004, 03:58 |
Re: Choice of turbulent models for jet impingement
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Would suggest starting with the one equation model, Spallart Allmaras. y+ vaues near 1, or over 30. check with the skin friction coefficient results from literature. that should give you a starting point.
Query: is this a supersonic jet impingment study that you are conducting? cheers Nandu |
|
September 28, 2004, 13:23 |
Re: Choice of turbulent models for jet impingement
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Nandu,
Thanks for your input. I am modelling subsonic jet impingement. I tried the Spallat Allmaras model but my problem requires refinement near the wall and hence the need for enhanced treatment near the walls. This option is provided by the K-epsilon model and that is why I chose this model. Thanks, Akash |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 40 | January 27, 2023 08:18 |
Laminar doesn't converge; Turbulent models do? | Amit | FLUENT | 11 | April 23, 2015 23:55 |
Is this understanding of turbulence models correct? | 3kha | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 31, 2011 22:31 |
Reynolds transport, turbulence model, etc | Beginner | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 7, 2009 06:36 |