|
[Sponsors] |
August 4, 2004, 18:03 |
k-omega
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've been using k-epsilon much in the past, but today I'm thinking about working with k-omega. I understand omega is a function of epsilon (i.e. omega is the specific dissipation rate), and the models may have some advantages over the k-epsilon models. Can anyone add some insight as to how, where, and/or why the k-omega could be more beneficial, and can anyone tell me when how to choose from the standard and from the SST?
|
|
August 10, 2004, 08:09 |
Re: k-omega
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have ever used standard k-w and sst k-w in mixing layer simulation. I found that standard k-w was not good. The sst k-w was more agree with the experiment data than standard k-w.
|
|
September 1, 2004, 18:05 |
Re: k-omega
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes, you're right. SST kw performs better because the freestream air does has much influence in the eddies motion. But a standard k-w does.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
overshooting of Omega in SST komega using simpleFoam | cm_jubayer | OpenFOAM | 2 | June 7, 2020 13:52 |
Boundary Conditions for k omega SST | dancfd | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | June 10, 2011 00:25 |
Omega at the wall | sla | FLUENT | 0 | January 10, 2011 05:16 |
Use of k omega turbulence model | john_w | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | September 22, 2009 06:15 |
Wall function implementation K Omega SSt | cbarry | OpenFOAM | 3 | August 18, 2009 11:09 |