 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
June 15, 2004, 05:17
|
mesh in gambit
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
shalom,
I'm trying to mesh a very simple model in gambit which I know his analitic solution : fully develop laminar flow between infinite parallel plates. when I solved it (2-D fluent) I got a different solution for every meshing. when I use very fine mesh I move away from the analitic solution (instead of congregate to it) what can be the problem ? Thanls a lot for your help yaron |
|
|
||
|
June 16, 2004, 02:20
|
mesh in gambit (2-D)
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
shalom,
I'm trying to mesh a very simple model in gambit which I know his analitic solution : fully develop laminar flow between infinite parallel plates. when I solved it (2-D fluent) I got a different solution for every meshing. when I use very fine mesh I move away from the analitic solution (instead of congregate to it) what can be the problem ? Thanls a lot for your help yaron |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
| Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
| Successive Mesh in Gambit | ashish | FLUENT | 0 | April 28, 2006 01:42 |
| How to mesh a circle by Gambit? | Zhengcai Ye | FLUENT | 5 | March 24, 2006 02:04 |
| [Commercial meshers] Mesh import from gambit | Kaushik Balakrishnan (Balakrishnan) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | April 21, 2005 14:42 |
Linear Mode
