|
[Sponsors] |
June 12, 2004, 10:16 |
First order upwind
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I want to know is it true that a second order upwind always provide a better accuracy than a first order one in all flow problem ? Thank . |
|
June 12, 2004, 13:57 |
Re: First order upwind
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yea it should do, at least as long as you get the second order upwind scheme to converge. The first order upwind scheme in fluent is very diffusive and it will quickly smear out all your shear layers etc.
|
|
June 13, 2004, 09:09 |
Re: First order upwind
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A higher order scheme is more accurate than a lower order one.
The problem is in the stability of the solution and the speed of convergence, which usually becomes lower as you increase the order of the scheme. Hi ap |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 09:21 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
Changing LimitedLinear to blend with 2nd order upwind instead of 1st order upwind | stevenvanharen | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | April 11, 2011 06:54 |
second order upwind cause divege !! | khsiavash | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 4, 2009 16:00 |