|
[Sponsors] |
November 18, 2003, 12:04 |
Separated Flow on Bluff Body
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I'm comparing CFD predictions of flow over a cube against an equivalant set of measured data. I've tried standard k-e, Realz k-e, RNG and RSM models. For each I have tried Standard WF, Non-Equil WF and Enhanced Wall treatment. I am finding it impossible to accurately predict the separation bubble. Upstream the V profiles are o.k. but in most cases (except standard k-e which is too small)the separation bubble is prediced as too big, in some cases not even reattaching on the upper surface of the cube! This is a 3-D steady state calculation. I can't understand why the RSM is so inaccurate, and why FLUENT fails so badly in predicting such an underlying flow regime. I'm running out of time and ideas. Anyone got any thoughts/experience on this. Thanks.
Regards, G. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Numerical Solution of the Blunt Body in Supersonic Flow Problem | andres17 | Main CFD Forum | 19 | April 26, 2016 16:29 |
how to accelerate fluid in bluff body case? | Rui | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 5, 2009 11:45 |
CFD of flow behind bluff body | puneshwar verma | FLUENT | 1 | January 1, 2007 14:20 |
Flow over Bluff bodies | cfdguy | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 26, 2005 13:31 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |