|
[Sponsors] |
November 13, 2003, 07:25 |
Boundary problem
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have an inlet on a box for which i have no boundary conditions. The inlet is just below a flame so that air is being sucked into the system from this inlet. What inlet boundary condition should i use. I would like to use an outflow boundary at the outlet to the system and this means i cannot use a pressure inlet boundary at the inlet. Is there a way around this? Can i set the inlet as a pressure outlet, is that appropriate? Regards Eric |
|
November 18, 2003, 21:48 |
Re: Boundary problem
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Your idea doesn't match coz when u set outlet as a boundary condition air will not be sucked anyway. I recken to set a fan as boundary condition.... that will blow air into the firebox as it needs.
Alamgir |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDS problem with wall boundary condition | Alex F. | FLUENT | 15 | September 21, 2015 10:28 |
[GAMBIT] 3D boundary layer and meshing problem in GAMBIT 2.4.6 | prashanthreddyh | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | December 20, 2011 01:35 |
Boundary layer meshing problem in Gambit | Crystal | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 12, 2009 15:32 |
problem boundary profiles | Rainy | FLUENT | 0 | April 24, 2008 06:30 |
GAMBIT problem with 3D Boundary Layer when meshing | Anthony Haroutunian | FLUENT | 2 | March 26, 2008 03:02 |