|
[Sponsors] |
September 24, 2003, 02:37 |
dpm-stochastic particle tracking
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I'd like to use the stochastic particle tracking for turbulent dispersion of particles in a turbulent flow. I followed the instructions in the ug but in my case the "number of tries" option is always inactiv and not selectable. Can anybody tell me a reason for this? How can I be sure that the turbulent dispersion of particles will be included by FLUENT? What do I have to do that this option will be selectable? Brief discription of my settings: Flow field: seg-solver, rsm-turbulence model, steady, 3d. After convergence of the flow field I introduced particles using the dpm-model dpm-setup: single injection, flow rate 0kg/s, dp=4e-6m, inert particles, stochastic model: random eddy life time - time constant 0.3. Thanks for all helpfull replies Anna |
|
September 24, 2003, 04:52 |
Re: dpm-stochastic particle tracking
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Try a group injection not a single injection. Also why is your flow rate set to 0kg/s. This cannot be set to 0kg/s.
When using the DPM approach you inject in a particle stream (or streams). The stream is characterised by it's strength, which is determined by the number of particles within the stream that pass a point per second. |
|
September 24, 2003, 08:03 |
Re: dpm-stochastic particle tracking
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I included your advices in my calculation but it didn't solve my problem so I returned to the old settings.
A 'group injection' is used if you want to set the defined initial conditions (d_p, T_p, x-, y-,z-coordinates..) between a certain range (see ug 19.9.2). Then FLUENT uses a linear variation between first and last value. I use a mass flow rate of 0kg/s because for uncoupled calculations it isn't necessary to specify a value (see ug 19.9.5). Over the several attempts to make the 'number of tries' check-box selectable I noticed that for me it isn't possible to use the cloud tracking model. But it is selcetable in the 'set multiple injections properties' panel - that seems funny to me. Are there any exlpanations for this? Anna |
|
January 15, 2020, 03:32 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
hadis
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM particle tracking in stirred tank | parisa- | FLUENT | 1 | August 7, 2012 13:03 |
DPM particle tracking | parisa- | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 15, 2011 06:12 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |
DPM tracking particle | Clementine | FLUENT | 0 | November 7, 2008 19:08 |
stochastic particle tracking | Prachi Mehta | FLUENT | 0 | March 26, 2004 10:00 |