|
[Sponsors] |
June 13, 2003, 17:36 |
Free form surface in fluent, two ways?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am trying to model the flow in a tank and want to specify the free form liquid at the top of the tank. I tried some searching on this forum and came up with two results.
1. Define the surface as a wall and then put the Shear stresses to 0 for x and y. 2. Define the surface with symmetry boundary condition. Can you please suggest which is better approach, as for 2, is it correct for setting the surface as boundary because i thought that symmetry meant just a 'mirror' in fluent. Thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF Defining VOF Free Surface at Outlet | Alex | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 13 | August 8, 2012 17:50 |
CFX convergence issues with free surface | adenlan | CFX | 3 | September 2, 2011 07:43 |
Hydrofoil modeling near free surface in fluent | Mojtaba Lajevardi | FLUENT | 2 | June 7, 2008 05:59 |
free surface display | novice | Siemens | 5 | August 4, 2004 02:07 |
Modeling Free Surface Flows | Elliot Schwartz | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 25, 1998 22:03 |