|
[Sponsors] |
physical velocity formulation and porous media |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 9, 2003, 12:29 |
physical velocity formulation and porous media
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello Gurus -
I have a 3D sim with a porous bundle zone. The flow regime is laminar at low Reynolds number. I am using the new physical velocity formulation for the porous media in FLUENT6.1 and have had successful (and rapid) convergence under steady state conditions. However, I am unable to get convergence for a time dependent simulation with fixed timestepping. I'm using the segregated solver with PRESTO! pressure interpolation, PISO P-V coupling, 2nd order momentum discretization and 1st order implicit time discretization. All solver parameters (underrelaxation factors and the like) are defaults. I begin from the steady state solution described above and have taken the timestep down to as low as 0.025 seconds - after one or two successful timesteps the residuals blow up. The size of the timestep doesn't seem to be the issue (although I welcome any "enlightenment" from you). Does anyone else have experience with a similar simulation setup or have some suggestions on what might be the problem? Best regards - Ken |
|
June 10, 2003, 06:42 |
Re: physical velocity formulation and porous media
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
May I knwo what system do you simulate?? e.g. liquid-gas, gas-gas or.....
do you grid size is fine enough?? I have tyr porous media with gas-gas, it seem no divergence problem to me... but did you check the concentration of you system?? do its tarry with any experimental or theory result?? |
|
June 10, 2003, 11:14 |
Re: physical velocity formulation and porous media
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ivan -
It's all liquid - the porous media is in place for pressure drop and fluid flow effects. I am not modeling a mixture or multiphase problem at this time. As for the grid - I achieve rapid convergence with the default solver settings for the steady-state solution so it appears to be fine by that functional metric. I believe the cell skewness and volume limits are ok - its a tet mesh so it ain't perfect, but it does appear adequate. Comparison with experimental data for the steady state systems has been good with past simulations. I am basically looking for the time-dependent simulation to converge to the steady state solution or thereabouts after a fair number of timesteps. All models used are the same but the time-dependent simulation diverges even with a very short timestep. I welcome further comments and thanks for the questions and insight. Regards - KLG |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiphase Porous Media Flow - Convergence Issues | VT_Bromley | FLUENT | 8 | May 30, 2024 03:59 |
Physical Velocity in Porous Media - FLUENT BUG ??? | DH | FLUENT | 1 | August 7, 2012 08:46 |
Porous formulation | visuja | FLUENT | 0 | July 7, 2009 22:37 |
Discrete phase model in porous media | Pradeep | FLUENT | 0 | February 3, 2006 17:30 |
Physical Velocity !!!! | pk | FLUENT | 0 | June 19, 2003 15:22 |