|
[Sponsors] |
June 9, 2003, 03:33 |
sliding meshes with periodic BC's
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Section 9.5.3 of the User's Guide says the following: "If you are modelling a rotor/stator geometry using periodicity, the periodic angle of the mesh around the rotor blade(s) must be the same as that of the mesh around the stationary vane(s)."
I'm trying to model a single rotor/stator section of an axial pump in Fluent 6 using the sliding mesh technique. (Right now I'm just doing a 2D model at the midspan of the blades.) My sliding mesh consists of a single channel from the rotor section and a single channel from the stator section. The problem is that the rotor and stator have different numbers of blades (i.e. the rotor blades are spaced farther apart than the stator blades) so the interfacing boundaries of the two meshes have different lengths. So, for the reasons listed above from ing user's manual, Fluent does not accept this mesh. It seems like there must be a way to solve this without modelling all the rotor/stator blades. Any suggestions? Thanks! Dan |
|
June 26, 2003, 04:35 |
Re: sliding meshes with periodic BC's
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi, Before answering your question, could you plese tell me why you choose sliding mesh theroy. Its for unsteady case and moreover to capture the stong interaction of stator and rotor. I don't know much about the sliding mesh theory. But i'm also working on rotor stator problem using mixing plane theroy. THis you can try out, but only this is this is steady state anlalysis. And this will take care of diffenent interface lenghts (mixing plane).
senthil. |
|
June 26, 2003, 15:01 |
Re: sliding meshes with periodic BC's
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Senthil,
Yes, we are looking specifically at strong rotor-stator interaction. This page contains a good description of the machine I'm modelling: http://www.me.jhu.edu/~lefd/turbo/turbo.htm As I said before it's an axial turbopump with 12 rotor blades and 17 stator blades. The animations on the page are from the actual experimental data observed using Particle Image Velocimety (but this is a CFD forurm so I'll just leave it at that...) Should I consider using the mixing plane approach? Can I still do unsteady analysis with that? Dan |
|
June 27, 2003, 08:10 |
Re: sliding meshes with periodic BC's
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dan, I look at the site you mentioned. Its great work.
Since you are intrested in rotor-stator interaction, Mixing plane will not work, as it is a steadt state asumption. The sliding mesh model is appropriate model to capture the interaction. Senthil. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Link faces meshes for periodic BC with ANSYS WORKBENCH | mawi01 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 5 | March 13, 2016 14:10 |
CFD of propeller with sliding meshes | ivanddd | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 19, 2011 14:30 |
Periodic BCs for flow through body centered cubic | Luigi_ | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | January 26, 2011 05:48 |
Pressure BCs or Periodic BCs for model of frost on vertical surface? | andy.eco | FLUENT | 2 | March 26, 2010 03:02 |
Periodic BC's for Thermal Lattice Boltzmann Method | anuhar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 4, 2009 04:45 |