|
[Sponsors] |
May 14, 2003, 12:23 |
backwards surface reaction
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is it possible to model a reversible surface reaction, for example A <-> B? The option is enabled in fluent5 but disabled in fluent6, which leads me to believe that it was not working in fluent5. I have tried creating two wall reactions, i.e. A -> B and B -> A at the same wall using UDF:
DEFINE_SR_RATE { if (!strcmp(r->name, "reaction-1")) { printf ("Reaction 1 being executed"); *rr = 500;} /* or any other value */ if (!strcmp(r->name, "reaction-2")) { printf ("Reaction 2 being executed"); *rr = 500;} /* or any other value */ } When run, the value for reaction-1 can be used to vary the species concentration whereas the value in reaction-2 has no effect. Also the message that reaction is being executed does not appear. Any help would be gratefully received. |
|
May 15, 2003, 08:50 |
Re: backwards surface reaction
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It seems that the UDF is never beign called with "reaction-2". Try to put this...
Message("%s\n",r->name); at the top of the UDF to see the reaction name. |
|
May 15, 2003, 09:14 |
Re: backwards surface reaction
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the help, I am trying that right now. I also through a face =%d in the massage so I could see what face number it was accessing. For each iteration it prints reaction-1 for all the faces on all of the iterations, so is it not recognisng the second reaction I explicity specified in the Fluent GUI? Also here is another question about the reaction model that may be a way around the problem: The rate of creation/destruction of species is given by: R = k [conc] when you set *rr in the SR_RATE UDF are you setting k or k[conc]? I assumed it was k but in the UDF manual section 4.3.16 there was this example:
DEFINE_SR_RATE(my_rate, f, t, r, mw, yi, rr) { Thread *t0=t->t0; cell_t c0=F_C0(f,t); real sih4 = yi[0]; /* mass fraction of sih4 at the wall */ real si2h6 = yi[1]; real sih2 = yi[2]; real h2 = yi[3]; real ar = yi[4]; /* mass fraction of ar at the wall */ real rho_w = 1.0, site_rho = 1.0e-6, T_w = 300.0; real si_s = yi[6]; /* site fraction of si_s*/ real sih_s = yi[7]; /* site fraction of sih_s*/ T_w = F_T(f,t); rho_w = C_R(c0,t0)*C_T(c0,t0)/T_w; sih4 *= rho_w/mw[0]; /* converting of mass fractions to molar concentrations */ si2h6 *= rho_w/mw[1]; sih2 *= rho_w/mw[2]; h2 *= rho_w/mw[3]; ar *= rho_w/mw[4]; si_s *= site_rho; /* converting of site fractions to site concentrations */ sih_s *= site_rho; if (STREQ(r->name, "reaction-1")) *rr = 100.0*sih4; else if (STREQ(r->name, "reaction-2")) *rr = 0.1*sih_s; else if (STREQ(r->name, "reaction-3")) *rr = 100*si2h6*si_s; else if (STREQ(r->name, "reaction-4")) *rr = 1.0e10*sih2; } where the concentrations are put in explicity. Any advise on this matter would be apprciated. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
surface reaction, porous media | Ali | FLUENT | 2 | March 31, 2016 18:26 |
[Gmsh] Problem with Gmsh | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 23 | August 5, 2015 03:09 |
Segmentation fault in running alternateSteadyReactingFoam,why? | NewKid | OpenFOAM | 18 | January 20, 2011 17:55 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |
chemical reaction - decompostition | La S. Hyuck | CFX | 1 | May 23, 2001 01:07 |