|
[Sponsors] |
Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem right? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 5, 2003, 09:09 |
Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem right?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear All Fluent Users?
I would like to invite the Fluent Users to run the following 2D problem on FLUENT 6.0.20 (6's). After you get the result, you post it your comment in this user discussion group or you and me can discuss it personally. Here is the problem? |--------------------------------| | f | d| | g |--------------------------------|--------------| b| | | |--------------------------------|--------------| a| | | |--------------------------------|--------------| c| | | |--------------------------------|--------------| e| | | | |--------------------------------| Lengths of edges a = 0.1 m (Inlet 1): Velocity Inlet b = 0.15 m (Inlet 2): Velocity Inlet c = 0.15 m (Inlet 3) : Velocity Inlet f = 12 m (wall edges) g = 3 m (wall edges) d = 0.96 m (wall edges) e = 0.96 m (wall edges) Boundry conditions U (Inlet 1) = 17 m/s (normal to the edge) U (Inlet 2) = 2 m/s (normal to the edge) U (Inlet 3) = 2 m/s (normal to the edge) Models: Flows only with Standard k & epsilon I used turbulent kinetic energi intensity 6 % and hydrodimanic diameter (0.1 m, 0.15 m and 0.15 m) I run it and I got the solution. I would like you to try it and we discuss the result. PLEASE DO IT with FLUENT 6. I did it with Fluent 6.0.20. Good Luck Yazid Bindar Chemical Engineering Dept., ITB, Bandung, Indonesia |
|
March 5, 2003, 09:16 |
Re: Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem ri
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear All
I am very sorry, the geometry description does not appear right as I type it using the post message window. I do not know how to make it right. Yazid Bindar |
|
March 5, 2003, 10:47 |
Re: Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem ri
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why don't you try solve problem with your fluent support.
Regards, ff |
|
March 5, 2003, 13:57 |
To paste a text figure
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<font face = "courier new">Yazid:
the way to produce the text here as you have it in the diagram is to add the html tag "pre". DO this: (1) Type <*pre> (without the star) (2) Copy paste your figure in this text box (3) Type <*/pre> (wihtout the star) followed by the figure. The figure would appear as you wanted. Eg: * * * * ** Murali </font> |
|
March 5, 2003, 22:06 |
Re: Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem ri
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Mr. FF
I got the results already. The results can be questioned and said to be "wrong'? Regard Yazid Bindar |
|
March 6, 2003, 04:09 |
Re: Rev: Can Fluent 6.0.20 predict this problem ri
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Did you try double precison 2D software. Is your mesh fine enough in high gradients regions. Check Report->Reference Values... for Depth and then corect your hydraulic diameter in velocity inlet panel. From your post I cant't see model geometry but for mixing two fluid streams of diferent velocities maybe mixing length turbulece model will give beter results. Hope this will corect results. Regards, ff |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fluent parallel problem in win7 x64 system | dunga82 | FLUENT | 8 | April 19, 2012 21:23 |
fluent convergence problem | josip76 | FLUENT | 0 | May 26, 2011 21:08 |
[ICEM] [FLUENT] 2D Geometry problem when exporting to Fluent - Unwanted walls | MikeTichondrius | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | February 9, 2011 14:31 |
Fluent boundary conditions problem | bobo | FLUENT | 2 | July 3, 2009 07:28 |
Problem about Fluent on Linux | hbinma | FLUENT | 3 | July 6, 2008 11:49 |