|
[Sponsors] |
January 19, 2003, 01:31 |
1st order temporal & 2nd order spatial
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm using 1st order temporal & 2nd order spatial discretization schemes to solve a low speed reacting laminar flow. someone told me that using 1st order time integration means converting the overall accuracy of the solution down to 1st order, irrespective of the 2nd order spatial discretization.
is this true? I thought by keeping my time step size small, I eliminate this error (???). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
1st order vs 2nd order | ken | FLUENT | 8 | March 14, 2013 04:43 |
Order of accuracy: 1st or 2nd order? | fisch | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | July 6, 2011 05:37 |
setting the 2nd order scheme in spatial and temporal discritization. | Jams | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 17, 2011 11:35 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |