|
[Sponsors] |
August 19, 2002, 02:22 |
just wondering.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Im am currently running energy together with velocity for a heat transfer problem.. Is it better to run velocity components first by disabling energy first, iterate get the results..and then enable energy and get the results separately Or is it better to enable both energy and velocity together and see the combined results? Kalai |
|
August 19, 2002, 09:19 |
Re: just wondering.
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This will work well for forced convection. Whereas natural convection it wouldn't work!
Ashu |
|
August 19, 2002, 11:02 |
Re: just wondering.
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
u mean running, energy together with velocity would work well for forced convection?
|
|
August 20, 2002, 00:08 |
Re: just wondering.
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think so.
Ashu |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[mesh manipulation] How to create patch after snappyHexMesh | hsieh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 33 | July 17, 2017 09:15 |
Combustion | Chalothon Thumthae (Thumthae) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 126 | June 24, 2016 07:16 |
IcoLagrangianFoam and particle forces | davidpalko | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 33 | December 2, 2013 03:39 |
Little question concerning pressure dimension | dinonettis | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | March 26, 2009 16:41 |
IcoTopo mixerMeshslide Foam Code | pilot | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | September 19, 2006 14:31 |