|
[Sponsors] |
Will UDF coding SOURCE TERM cancel out existing 1 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 11, 2002, 23:09 |
Will UDF coding SOURCE TERM cancel out existing 1
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm very new at UDF, I wanna code SOURCE TERM, but I'm wondering when I introduce the UDF in Fluent, does it cancel out the other source terms which r already exist in Fluent, like body force etc. or do I need to code all together? Very clear, I'll introduce universal gravitational forces, adhesive force, van der waals forces etc. do I need to code separately for each term? or adding them all together in one code?
Help me, thanksalot ahead. Alamgir |
|
August 12, 2002, 09:28 |
Re: Will UDF coding SOURCE TERM cancel out existin
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If other sources are constant then it doesn't affect, else you may have to write all the UDF in one file with different type of source terms like energy, momentum etc. Fluent can use only one UDF file in case of interpreted UDF.
Bye Ashu |
|
August 12, 2002, 21:10 |
Re: Will UDF coding SOURCE TERM cancel out existin
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'll try in this and let you know, thanks anyway.
Alamgir |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[swak4Foam] swak4foam building problem | GGerber | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 54 | April 24, 2015 17:02 |
DxFoam reader update | hjasak | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 69 | April 24, 2008 02:24 |
PDE in udf for defining momentum source term | shekhar | FLUENT | 0 | April 12, 2004 02:43 |
a question about UDF for source term | winnie | FLUENT | 1 | May 2, 2003 10:11 |
UDFs for Scalar Eqn - Fluid/Solid HT | Greg Perkins | FLUENT | 0 | October 11, 2000 04:43 |