DPM Modeling of high Biot Number Particles

June 18, 2002, 11:07

The Fluent DPM can only assume constant internal temperature of the particles, which is not a great assumption if working with large and/or low-conducting particles. Anyone have any experience implementing internal particle conduction via UDF? I am interested in modeling trajectory and evaporation rates vs particle size, so this capability is a must.

Many thanks,

qiang92 · June 7, 2017, 03:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Stanislawsky
;101389

The Fluent DPM can only assume constant internal temperature of the particles, which is not a great assumption if working with large and/or low-conducting particles. Anyone have any experience implementing internal particle conduction via UDF? I am interested in modeling trajectory and evaporation rates vs particle size, so this capability is a must.

Many thanks,

Do you figure out how to implementing internal particle conduction in particles in fluent?

June 18, 2002, 11:07	DPM Modeling of high Biot Number Particles	#1
Bob Stanislawsky Guest Posts: n/a	The Fluent DPM can only assume constant internal temperature of the particles, which is not a great assumption if working with large and/or low-conducting particles. Anyone have any experience implementing internal particle conduction via UDF? I am interested in modeling trajectory and evaporation rates vs particle size, so this capability is a must. Many thanks,

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
trying to simulate two-phase jet flow with particles in surface injection	ajkratos	FLUENT	5	March 3, 2015 22:33
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere!	sc298	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	2	March 27, 2011 22:11
Large Eddy Simulation with too high Mach number	Roland R	CFX	4	November 25, 2010 17:43
Low Reynolds number K-Omega modeling	Athar Zaidi	Main CFD Forum	0	October 31, 1999 14:59
High Schmidt Number	Jon Johnson	Main CFD Forum	5	October 30, 1999 11:00