|
[Sponsors] |
December 13, 2001, 22:04 |
Fluent 6 - Good or Bad?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've heard that Fluent 6 is about and should be distributed on CD in Jan. I think you can get it via ftp now.
I heard that the Eulerian model is only isothermal - there is no potential for heat transfer!!! If this is correct - what have Fluent Inc been doing all this time. Heat transfer in the Eulerian models has been in 4.5 for years - why isn't it in 6.0??? I also notice that their blurb states you can "try" out the defomring mesh models. This implies to me they aren't that confident of them. Given that this release has been pushed back so much, its disappointing that it still doesn't fully replace 4.5. I just don't understand! Should customers consider CFX for industrial multiphase flows!? Anyone got any experience or reasons...? Greg |
|
December 13, 2001, 23:05 |
Re: Fluent 6 - Good or Bad?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fluent 6.0 has been released to beta testers from the industry, to my knowledge, since approximately September this year.
Is there anyone who can answer Greg's questions? I'm really interested to ear some opinions. Newbie |
|
January 16, 2002, 16:10 |
Re: Fluent 6 - Good or Bad?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am interested in knowing any bad experience in using Fluent for turbomachinery especially submersible pumps as well as gas separators which will be 2 phase flow with multiple reference frames. I am comparing CFX-5 with Fluent6.0 Any recommendations or suggestions are welcome.
Thanks Jay Jayaram |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent - license problem. | Marcin | FLUENT | 3 | April 13, 2018 17:33 |
few quesions on ANSYS ICEMCFD and FLUENT | Prakash.Paudel | ANSYS | 0 | August 12, 2010 13:07 |
Good MEsh and a bad one | Himanshu Sharma | FLUENT | 3 | June 6, 2006 04:24 |
Problems of Duns Codes! | Martin J | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 15, 2003 00:19 |
Fluent equation error?!? | TOM | FLUENT | 6 | July 15, 2002 04:24 |