|
[Sponsors] |
August 21, 2001, 10:21 |
creating "inverted" pathlines ??
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi !
I would like to know if it is possible,in fluent5, to create pathlines that are entering a defined area ?? in fact the opposite of pathlines released by a defined area (as proposed natively in fluent) , which i can do... or are creating customized rake-surfaces the only way to get that ?? thanks Charles |
|
August 24, 2001, 15:59 |
Re: creating "inverted" pathlines ??
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pathlines are massless particle traces of your flow field. The pathlines "go with the flow", essentially. If you are wondering how to create pathlines in regions of reciculating flow, then create surfaces (points, rakes, etc.) positioned strategically in your solution domain.
|
|
August 27, 2001, 14:15 |
Re: creating "inverted" pathlines ??
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes it's possible. Select the surface that you want your pathlines to go to. Then check the 'Reverse' checkbox under options. This will show pathlines going into the surface.
You can make a complete picture by checking 'Overlays' in the Scene description panel and subsequently to do regular pathlines (no Reverse) from your source surface. The end result will be pathlines going 'through' your selected surface. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Commercial meshers] Fluent3DMeshToFoam | simvun | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 50 | January 19, 2020 16:33 |
[blockMesh] Problems in creating a wedge type mesh | Joscha | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 28 | August 3, 2019 08:59 |
Problem in running ICEM grid in Openfoam | Tarak | OpenFOAM | 6 | September 9, 2011 18:51 |
Pls answer my simple doubt concerning pathlines | Jig | FLUENT | 13 | March 17, 2009 02:14 |
Problems with Meshing: Collapsed Cells | Emmanuel Resch | Siemens | 1 | July 30, 2007 04:02 |