|
[Sponsors] |
February 23, 2001, 07:04 |
Using Fluent for Geophysical Problems
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Those who use Fluent 5 for geophysical problems - note that there is an error (relevant only for geophysical problems) which can be corrected by a UDF. namely, the energy equation does NOT contain the gz term (See the forms of the energy equation in the book of Byrd, stewart and Lighthill). I was wondering if anyone in this list has ever tried transforming the variable in the energy equation from temperature to potential temperature. The reason is that in geophysical problems the gradient of heat is proportional to the potential energy gradient, rather than the energy gradient as in Fluent and other packages. Any help on this would be appreciated: anybody knowing of any publications on the subject ?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces | tommymoose | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | December 1, 2020 12:12 |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 04:22 |
Aeroacoustic Problem (Modeling Flow-Induced Noise Problems Using FLUENT) | cici | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 29, 2011 15:28 |
Problems with FLUENT MPI on i7 2600K/P8P67 | TaurusASV | FLUENT | 1 | May 5, 2011 12:58 |
Problems with Fluent | Jacek | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 16, 2002 05:14 |