CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Low Ren Number

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 25, 2000, 06:57
Default Low Ren Number
  #1
KIAN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For low Reynolds number modelling which model is most suitable? Or that I have to do some post-processing. I have come across some articles saying that k-e model is still mostly commonly used, but there are disagreement with the data. Have the same problem with my computation data that doesn't agree with my experiment data.

Currently, I am using the standard k-e with layer zone for near wall. and my grid spacing is at 0.07 in a 4.6 x 3 room. having the inlet velocity of 0.4m/s.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 29, 2000, 06:54
Default Re: Low Ren Number
  #2
araujo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fluent offers the low-Re-Model as wall function hidden in the text menu - you have to type: >define...>models...>viscous...>...then you see low-re-model, which will appear after that in your graphical menu. Maybe it is that what you want or need....
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
low reynolds number models in Fluent doug Main CFD Forum 6 August 4, 2012 15:39
Low Reynolds Number Instability in icoFoam - Cavity Case kmooney OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 October 8, 2009 15:09
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 August 15, 2008 08:36
About low Reynolds number airfoil experiment data. zqnwpu Main CFD Forum 5 December 25, 2004 04:52
how calculate the density in low mach number? Juhee Lee Main CFD Forum 1 July 31, 1999 16:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:36.