|
[Sponsors] |
Conjugate (with Solid Domain) vs Fluid Domain Analyses |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 27, 2024, 07:38 |
Conjugate (with Solid Domain) vs Fluid Domain Analyses
|
#1 |
New Member
HK-Paz
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello Dear All,
I tried 2 different simulations for the same boundary conditions. One of them was included solid body (Heat Exchanger) to do conjugate heat transfer analysis. I got my results. then, I wanted to try only for fluid domain to compare with conjugate heat transfer analysis's results. I did not change any boundary conditions, just I suppress my solid body which is around my fluid domain. then I started simulation. When I obtained the results coming from fluid domain analysis, I saw there are differences for Pressure Drop, Friction Factor, Average Wall temperature, and Nusselt number. I was expecting, it should give the same results with Conjugate heat transfer analysis. Do you have any idea why I could not achieve this? |
|
Tags |
ansys fluent, conjugate heat transfer, fluid domain, heat transfer, laminar flow |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conjugate Heat Transfer: Solid Time Step in Transient Simulation, DO Model | Dingens | FLUENT | 0 | July 9, 2021 07:19 |
Conjugate heat transfer | virothi | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 5, 2021 05:46 |
Table bounds warnings at: END OF TIME STEP | CFXer | CFX | 4 | July 17, 2020 00:44 |
Setting rotating frame of referece. | RPFigueiredo | CFX | 3 | October 28, 2014 05:59 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |