|
[Sponsors] |
Specify a UDS sink at a wall to deplete UDS at a specify rate |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 19, 2024, 08:09 |
Specify a UDS sink at a wall to deplete UDS at a specify rate
|
#1 |
New Member
Adi
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: sydney
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone,
I have set-up 2 user defined scalar to be solve in fluent. One of the UDS uses the default unsteady function and mass flow rate as the flux function. In other words, I have implemented a scalar transport equation with the scalar having the units of #/kg. (Note that in my case the scalar is space charge, thus its unit is Coulombs/kg (C/kg)) I want one of the wall in my transient simulation to act like a sink, where it depletes the UDS (space charge) at a specified rate. My current approach is by using Fluent's GUI to set the boundary condition, at the wall, as "specify flux". I assume the unit would be in C/(m^2.s). For example, if I set it to +1, I assume that it means the wall will depletes Coulombs of space charge per m^2 of the wall per second. However, this does not seem to work and my solution keep diverging even at a timestep and under-relaxation parameter smaller than I would like it to be ideally. Note that the simulation does not diverge when i specify the flux boundary condition to be zero. I have look at this post (Perfect sink for an UDS scalar concentration), and seems that there is another way to specify the sink wall. But I think that post only applies if the wall depletes all scalar that come in contact with it. In other words, it is the same as specifying a zero value BC for the scalar. So my questions is: 1. How should I implement a sink BC that depletes the UDS at a specified rate? Is my current approach correct? 2. If my approach is correct, then is there a work around to avoid the diverging solution without decreasing timestep and the under-relaxation parameter? |
|
Tags |
boundary condition, flux boundary condition, uds flux, uds source |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
temperature correction limited- Star ccm+ | LpSingh | STAR-CCM+ | 15 | September 29, 2020 12:06 |
Table bounds warnings at: END OF TIME STEP | CFXer | CFX | 4 | July 17, 2020 00:44 |
spcify heat sink and temperature on a wall | nima103 | FLUENT | 7 | May 26, 2020 13:19 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment | paduchev | FLUENT | 24 | January 8, 2018 12:55 |
No-error UDF for wall heat generation rate but no heat is exchanged?!? | NPs | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | May 11, 2017 07:19 |