CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Specify a UDS sink at a wall to deplete UDS at a specify rate

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 19, 2024, 08:09
Smile Specify a UDS sink at a wall to deplete UDS at a specify rate
  #1
New Member
 
Adi
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: sydney
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
adi959719 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I have set-up 2 user defined scalar to be solve in fluent. One of the UDS uses the default unsteady function and mass flow rate as the flux function. In other words, I have implemented a scalar transport equation with the scalar having the units of #/kg. (Note that in my case the scalar is space charge, thus its unit is Coulombs/kg (C/kg))

I want one of the wall in my transient simulation to act like a sink, where it depletes the UDS (space charge) at a specified rate. My current approach is by using Fluent's GUI to set the boundary condition, at the wall, as "specify flux". I assume the unit would be in C/(m^2.s). For example, if I set it to +1, I assume that it means the wall will depletes Coulombs of space charge per m^2 of the wall per second.

However, this does not seem to work and my solution keep diverging even at a timestep and under-relaxation parameter smaller than I would like it to be ideally. Note that the simulation does not diverge when i specify the flux boundary condition to be zero.

I have look at this post (Perfect sink for an UDS scalar concentration), and seems that there is another way to specify the sink wall. But I think that post only applies if the wall depletes all scalar that come in contact with it. In other words, it is the same as specifying a zero value BC for the scalar.

So my questions is:
1. How should I implement a sink BC that depletes the UDS at a specified rate? Is my current approach correct?
2. If my approach is correct, then is there a work around to avoid the diverging solution without decreasing timestep and the under-relaxation parameter?
adi959719 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundary condition, flux boundary condition, uds flux, uds source


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
temperature correction limited- Star ccm+ LpSingh STAR-CCM+ 15 September 29, 2020 12:06
Table bounds warnings at: END OF TIME STEP CFXer CFX 4 July 17, 2020 00:44
spcify heat sink and temperature on a wall nima103 FLUENT 7 May 26, 2020 13:19
Enhanced Wall Treatment paduchev FLUENT 24 January 8, 2018 12:55
No-error UDF for wall heat generation rate but no heat is exchanged?!? NPs Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 May 11, 2017 07:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42.