|
[Sponsors] |
May 3, 2024, 16:56 |
NACA 0012 AIRFOIL Validation errors
|
#1 |
New Member
Indranil Roy
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello friends and CFD Enthusiasts,
I have been struggling to work on one of the problems which involves simulation of a conventional NACA 0012 airfoil. Despite trying almost everything I haven't been able to match the simulation values with the experimental values (Ladson study, NASA). I have refined the mesh, run the simulation on structured mesh (0.2 million elements) and unstructured mesh (2.4 million elements) using the K-Omega and K-Epsilon turbulence models. I have even tried the Spallart Almaras model too. However, none of them have yielded favourable results. For a Reynolds number of 1 Million, The EXPERIMENTAL VALUE: cl=0.5 approximately for the airfoil around 5° angle of attack. cd=0.008 But the CFD analysis is only yielding, cl=0.245 cd=-0.008 I have even ran an XFLR analysis at Re=1 Million. Even that value seemed fairly in agreement with the experimental values. Can someone please suggest where I maybe going wrong? |
|
Tags |
#airfoil, #fluenterror, #naca0012 #validation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NACA 0012 Airfoil, simpleFoam, Spalart Allmaras | badwalgurpreet | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | October 28, 2024 04:03 |
Low Reynolds NACA 0012 validation | 35matt215 | CFX | 9 | March 17, 2019 23:12 |
2way fsi over naca 0012 airfoil | drooleybob | FLUENT | 3 | June 27, 2016 22:42 |
Floating point exception error | lpz_michele | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 53 | October 19, 2015 03:50 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |