|
[Sponsors] |
May 1, 2024, 07:32 |
Conjugate Heat Transfer in Shell bodies
|
#1 |
New Member
Rodrigo
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello, I am doing a structural optimization of a supersonic fighter jet wing for my end of degree thesis. To do so, I need to consider the effect of aerodynamic heating to assess thermal stresses in the wing.
Since the final objective is the sizing of the wing's structural components, I do not know the thickness of the skin beforehand, so I need to set up an iterative process to optimize this. This is where my issues in Fluent arise. I want to study the conjugate heat transfer problem between the hot air in the boundary layer and the wing. As the wing's skin is very thin (and student's version node limits) I really don't want to mesh it, since for every value of the thickness I would need to remesh. So, I am using surfaces as shell bodies to enable shell conduction and avoid meshing the wing. From my research on Youtube and forums, it looks like CHT problems require a solid cell zone and a fluid cell zone. This creates a shadow wall pair and enables to choose the "Coupled" wall thermal boundary condition. I'll explain my current set-up for better understanding. I have the fluid volume I want to study, and the surface of the wing. I have performed boolean operation to substract the wing from the air volume. Then, I shared the topology such that the wing and air have a conformal mesh. I am aware that for CFD one does not need to mesh the wing surface, but instead can apply a boundary condition to the walls of the air volume. However, I did this in an attempt to see if meshing the wing's surface would make a solid cell zone appear, which it has not. So, the final question is: How can I set up the conjugate heat transfer problem between a fluid and a shell body? How can I create a solid cell zone such that it allows the coupled boundary condition? What if: I mesh a solid version of the wing, which I hope it creates a solid cell zone. Then, the shadow walls appear, which I can apply the coupled BC to, and enable shell conduction throughout the wall. Then, I would only be interested in the results of the shell. How could I retrieve them? Would the solid wing wall affect the results? Thank you very much. |
|
May 1, 2024, 12:35 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lorenzo Galieti
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 12 |
So, I think you need to subtract the wing so as to get the flow domain, but the wing solid domain must still exist. Then the two body together (flow and wing) will have a interface where the CHT problem is solved. If you delete the solid with subtract, it will not work
|
|
Tags |
fluent, heat, shell, transfer |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help needed: Simple pipeline flow heat exchange, yet the total heat transfer rate re | RC_Jiang | FLUENT | 0 | March 25, 2024 21:49 |
The Specified y+ Heat Transfer Coefficient | Sunfangfang | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | March 8, 2024 05:54 |
No conjugate heat transfer between solid (cast iron) and fluid (water) part | Rajaero | FLUENT | 5 | June 25, 2023 04:07 |
Fluent conjugate heat transfer Multiple bodies with coupled wall interfaces is giving | vipulramk | FLUENT | 1 | March 6, 2018 05:27 |
Conjugate Heat Transfer: Wall Heat Flux at Coupled Walls? | MaxHeat | FLUENT | 4 | September 14, 2017 11:44 |