CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Can not achieve a pseudo-steady-state condition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 1, 2024, 07:53
Default Can not achieve a pseudo-steady-state condition
  #1
New Member
 
marcus aurelius
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 3
marcusaurelius is on a distinguished road
I am trying to simulate 2D conjugate heat transfer over a finned surface. The simulation works fine and shows some results as shown in Figure 1, which is temperature profile.

But, the problem is that the wall temperature keeps rising even after simulating it for 60 seconds of time (transient) as shown Figure 2.

I expect the wall temperature to reach some pseuso-steady state condition (imaginary plot is shown in Figure 3). But it does not reach that stage.

I have made mesh really small (having minimum cell size = 0.00005 m) and time step of 0.00005 s, which are the smaller values than what I see in literature. So, I think mesh or time step is not the problem. Also I use second order schemes. I tried all SIMPLE, PISO and coupled. and all does not show the desired result (Temp still keeps rising)

I have also seen similar problem with other software as well. I am sure I have been doing something fundamental mistake here. What is it?
Attached Images
File Type: png Figure 1 Conjugate HT.PNG (21.4 KB, 8 views)
File Type: png Figure 2 Wall Temp vs Time.PNG (8.1 KB, 6 views)
File Type: png Figure 3 Expected result.png (13.6 KB, 5 views)
marcusaurelius is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2024, 23:25
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
You need to run for a very long time (e.g. 15 minutes) to achieve steady state. A smaller mesh size and smaller time-step is unrelated to that requirement and makes it even most costly to achieve
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2024, 02:52
Default
  #3
New Member
 
marcus aurelius
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 3
marcusaurelius is on a distinguished road
15 min is too much.

Also, with some online search I found two possible problems. One is when I do 2D, I need to adjust the heat flux (by reducing the reference depth) and other can be solid time step value. Solid time step should be much larger for this case (I don't know much large though).
marcusaurelius is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
conducion, conjugate heat transfer, convection, heat flux


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference steady state / unsteady dnl_xr OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 1 March 9, 2024 10:25
Steady state solution as an initial condition for a transient problem adnanakhtar FLUENT 7 November 25, 2016 06:16
Time Increment Significance in Steady state FEM CFD solvers? Abhya Main CFD Forum 1 October 14, 2015 21:07
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 09:56
steady state, laminar vof_model Garima Chaudhary FLUENT 0 May 24, 2007 04:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21.